‘2.5k? Boers and decades of repression’

It always amuses me that ‘Kruger’s War’ can still enrage the True Believers, so many years after it came out. I was recently made aware that someone had dared to recommend it on a British and Commonwealth Forces Facebook Group:

Needless to say, this got the normal slack-jawed apologists all revved up, and out they came, squealing and squawking:

A well-reasoned, exhaustively-referenced rebuttal from Meneer Brits there… it really is an admission that it’s all they have, as there is no way they can actually explain where I am incorrect.

Amusingly, the next clown off the block admitted his hatred of the book was based on not actually having read it at all. It would be like me jumping on social media to tell the world I hate a restaurant that I have never eaten at:

Of course, Meneer Lambert doesn’t trouble to explain why he hasn’t bothered to read the book – but he is happy to declare that I am ‘as bad as extreme right Africaners in SA’. Quite why, is unclear.

But if the panic-stricken offerings by Lambert and Brits are bad enough, the next buffoon was even more entertaining, as up stepped Adrian von Cretin:


A better ‘summary’ would be: Adrian von Cretin has never read a single book on the Boer War, but clings to National Party myth as it makes him feel better about himself.

I have heard a lot of highly entertaining excuses for the Boer defeat over the years, but none have been as utterly deranged as von Cretin’s claim that there were only 2½k Boers. In reality, the Boers fielded some 87,365 men (not counting the tens of thousands of blacks who were forced to perform rear echelon tasks), broken down as follows:

‘…the Transvaal raised 26,871 men initially, to which 14,779 were added later, while the Free State raised 21,345, to which 6,264 were added. Both states had a small regular force manning artillery, 800 men in the Transvaal, manning twelve fortress guns, 13 obsolete mountain guns and 21 Maxim ‘pom-poms’ (quick-firing 1-pounders), and 375 men in the Free State, manning nineteen field guns, four mountain guns and three Maxims … in addition 13,300 ‘rebels’ from the colonies of Natal and the Cape joined the commandos, as did 800 foreigners. There was also a Foreign Corps of 2,120, including 500 Irish, 320 Dutch, 200 Germans, 100 Scandinavians, 75 Italians, 50 French, 50 Americans, and 25 Russians. The Boer forces eventually totalled 87,365.[i]

As over 4,000 Boers were captured at Paardeberg, and another 4,000 plus at Brandwater Basin, it really takes a special kind of stupid to announce that there were only ever 2,500. Where does he think the other 85,000 disappeared to?

And onto von Cretin’s next claim: the Boers did not kill ‘25k soldiers’. That’s another blatant lie. British / Empire deaths in the Boer War were 21,942 – of whom 13,250 died of disease (yes, you read it here first: disease killed people who weren’t in concentration camps too), 798 died in accidents and another 102 died in Boer captivity[ii] (note, I didn’t say ‘were murdered’ in Boer captivity – because that would be every bit as stupid as the things the True Believers claim).

So, von Cretin was wrong by a factor of about three, as the Boers only managed to kill 7,792 British / Imperial officers and men. So why did he lie? Well, I think we all know the answer to that.

And as for his next piece of Ocean-going stupidity: the British certainly didn’t kill 20k civilians – unless von Cretin thinks that anyone who died from disease was killed by the British. Again, he is just unthinkingly spewing out NP myth and propaganda, and hoping to get away with his lies.

In a final flourish of abject ignorance, von Cretin then splendidly proclaims that ‘the repression continued for decades after’. Again, this is utter rubbish: the former Boer republics were both granted self-rule within a few years of British victory, and South Africa was United as – for all intents a purposes – an independent nation in 1910. The only ‘repression that continued for decades’ was done by the Apartheid Government, which came into power in 1948 – some 46 years after the Boer War.

Indeed, it is the myths of this repressive regime which von Cretin so loyally treated us to.

Von Cretin got one thing right in his lunatic outburst, though: we will certainly laugh at his post. Not because we are British, though – but because he is a deluded fool.

NOTES:

[i] Carver, The National Army Museum book of the Boer War, p.14

[ii] Hall, The Hall Handbook of the Anglo-Boer War, p.187

7 Comments

  • Colin Posted August 8, 2025 10:57 am

    We live in a country where 2 recognised information centres, the Voortrekker Monument and the Anglo Boer War Museum in Bloemfontein are still allowed to spout out lies, myths, and complete BS on their history. C. De Wet & De la Rey both undefeated, Kruger the peaceful farmer. God is with us the chosen people! God is with us said General Robert E Lee. Coincidence that a portion of those Confederate states still think they won the war too?

    • Bulldog Posted August 8, 2025 11:17 am

      Yup… state-sponsored propaganda still continues even today. Incredible, though even more incredible is that there are still plenty of idiots who want / need to believe the myths.

      The similarities between the NP myths of the Boer War and the ‘Lost Causers’ of the ACW are remarkable:

      https://www.chrisash.co.za/2022/07/18/the-lost-cause-of-the-confederacy-and-the-myths-of-the-boer-war/

      • Colin Posted August 8, 2025 11:54 am

        The yanks have the KKK we have a nation of people fed on Religion, Racism and Rampant Deceit ! The germans never believed they lost WW1 and look where that ended.

  • James Grant Posted August 8, 2025 1:16 pm

    So its down to 2500 now? What next? One Boer against a million Brits? These idiots are beyond a bloody joke anything to keep their fairy stories alive

    If he wasnt sure how many Boers fought why didnt he read up before making a bloody twat of himself ?

    • Bulldog Posted August 8, 2025 2:09 pm

      James, perhaps Churchill put it best, “I’d rather argue against a hundred idiots, than have one agree with me”.

  • Guy Keeling Posted August 9, 2025 3:05 pm

    It is bizarre that the Boers had 2,500 men
    Fransjohan Pretorius stated that the Transvaal had 32,000 men
    Arthur Conan Doyle estimated that the two republics had 35,000 men
    Pakenham at 54,000 men
    Bossenbroek at 60,000 men with 9000 ‘Agterryersor non combatants
    Bill Nasson wrote that the Natal invasion force led by Joubert had 14,000 men, assisted by Prinsloo from the OFS with 6000 men
    At the end of the war, Barker states that
    11,166 surrendered in the Transvaal
    6455 surrendered in the OFS
    3635 surrendered in the Cape Colony

    • Bulldog Posted August 10, 2025 7:34 am

      Yes… bizarre, and utterly self-serving. There is a well-established obsession amongst these idiots of squealing about ‘millions’ of British soldiers against farcically tiny numbers of Boers. Of course, if they admitted that Britain only ever had about 220,000 men in theatre at the same time, and there were over 87,000 Boers (plus the tens of thousands of non-combatant support), suddenly their relatively rapid defeat is not the act of ‘epic, invincible defiance’ that they like to pretend.

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *